https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220879 The petition was dismissed with costs of Rs.1 Lakh, divided equally between respondent nos.1 and 2, and respondent no.3. The court upheld the validity of the filings made by respondent no.3, compliance with the Companies Act, and the maintainability of recovery proceedings. Allegations of forgery and fabrication were rejected, and the principle of res judicata was applied to prevent re-litigation of the issues. en-us Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Feb 2013 06:32:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220879 The petition was dismissed with costs of Rs.1 Lakh, divided equally between respondent nos.1 and 2, and respondent no.3. The court upheld the validity of the filings made by respondent no.3, compliance with the Companies Act, and the maintainability of recovery proceedings. Allegations of forgery and fabrication were rejected, and the principle of res judicata was applied to prevent re-litigation of the issues. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220879