<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 280 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220875</link>
    <description>Input service credit on insurance service was held admissible even though the service was not availed within the factory premises. The Tribunal applied the CENVAT Credit Rules and held that they do not require an input service to be received only inside the factory for credit eligibility. Relying on precedent treating insurance-related services as input service, it found the credit denial unsustainable and allowed the assessee&#039;s claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 09:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 280 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220875</link>
      <description>Input service credit on insurance service was held admissible even though the service was not availed within the factory premises. The Tribunal applied the CENVAT Credit Rules and held that they do not require an input service to be received only inside the factory for credit eligibility. Relying on precedent treating insurance-related services as input service, it found the credit denial unsustainable and allowed the assessee&#039;s claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220875</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>