<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 273 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220868</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the first appellate authority, finding that the impugned order was correct, legal, and without any infirmity. The appeal filed by the Revenue was rejected, and the cross objection was disposed of by the Tribunal, affirming the validity of the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 10:16:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 273 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220868</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the first appellate authority, finding that the impugned order was correct, legal, and without any infirmity. The appeal filed by the Revenue was rejected, and the cross objection was disposed of by the Tribunal, affirming the validity of the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>