<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 272 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220867</link>
    <description>Refund of unutilized CENVAT credit under Notification No. 5/2006-CE (N.T.) was treated as available where the services had a direct business nexus with export operations. Rent-related facilities such as car park, cafeteria and terrace, along with outdoor catering, in-house training and professional services, were regarded as input services because they supported the assessee&#039;s business and export activity. The professional services were linked to return preparation and certification work, and the assessee&#039;s status as a 100% EOU under the STPI scheme reinforced the connection. On these facts, the departmental objection failed and the refund claim was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2014 09:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194228" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 272 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220867</link>
      <description>Refund of unutilized CENVAT credit under Notification No. 5/2006-CE (N.T.) was treated as available where the services had a direct business nexus with export operations. Rent-related facilities such as car park, cafeteria and terrace, along with outdoor catering, in-house training and professional services, were regarded as input services because they supported the assessee&#039;s business and export activity. The professional services were linked to return preparation and certification work, and the assessee&#039;s status as a 100% EOU under the STPI scheme reinforced the connection. On these facts, the departmental objection failed and the refund claim was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>