<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 266 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220861</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the revised return filed by the appellant under section 139(4) was invalid under section 139(5). The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, concluding that the benefits of section 139(5) do not extend to delayed returns filed under section 139(4). The substantial question of law was answered in favor of the Revenue, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2013 17:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 266 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220861</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the revised return filed by the appellant under section 139(4) was invalid under section 139(5). The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, concluding that the benefits of section 139(5) do not extend to delayed returns filed under section 139(4). The substantial question of law was answered in favor of the Revenue, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>