<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 259 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220854</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, overturning the disallowances under Section 40(a)(ia) for the assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09. It directed the Assessing Officer to consider the feasibility study expenditure under Section 35D for the assessment year 2008-09. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the nature of payments as reimbursements of salaries, not contractual payments, thus not subject to tax deduction at source (TDS).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 10:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 259 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220854</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, overturning the disallowances under Section 40(a)(ia) for the assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09. It directed the Assessing Officer to consider the feasibility study expenditure under Section 35D for the assessment year 2008-09. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the nature of payments as reimbursements of salaries, not contractual payments, thus not subject to tax deduction at source (TDS).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>