https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220853 The Court dismissed the petition challenging an order upholding an anti-dumping duty notification on Acrylonitrile Butadiene Rubber from Korea and Germany, citing the availability of an alternate appellate remedy under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The Court emphasized the incorporation of appeal provisions from the Customs Act, 1962, for duties under Section 9A, allowing appeals to the Tribunal, High Court, and Supreme Court. The petition was deemed not maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution, and the Petitioners were directed to pursue the appellate remedy provided by law, with no costs awarded. en-us Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Nov 2013 17:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220853 The Court dismissed the petition challenging an order upholding an anti-dumping duty notification on Acrylonitrile Butadiene Rubber from Korea and Germany, citing the availability of an alternate appellate remedy under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The Court emphasized the incorporation of appeal provisions from the Customs Act, 1962, for duties under Section 9A, allowing appeals to the Tribunal, High Court, and Supreme Court. The petition was deemed not maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution, and the Petitioners were directed to pursue the appellate remedy provided by law, with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220853