<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 250 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220845</link>
    <description>The appellant was allowed to claim CENVAT credit for the period before 1/4/2008 but was not entitled to claim credit on GTA service for outward transportation of final products post that date due to an amendment in the rules. The appellant was directed to repay the credit availed after 1/4/2008, with interest, and a nominal penalty of Rs. 1,000 was imposed. Other penalties were set aside, and the appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 10:14:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 250 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220845</link>
      <description>The appellant was allowed to claim CENVAT credit for the period before 1/4/2008 but was not entitled to claim credit on GTA service for outward transportation of final products post that date due to an amendment in the rules. The appellant was directed to repay the credit availed after 1/4/2008, with interest, and a nominal penalty of Rs. 1,000 was imposed. Other penalties were set aside, and the appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>