<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 240 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220835</link>
    <description>The Court found the execution of recovery notices under Section 226(3) to be arbitrary and high-handed, depriving the Petitioner of any recourse. It directed the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to dispose of the stay applications promptly and ordered the Revenue to return Rs.1 crore to the Petitioner&#039;s bank account for operational purposes. The remaining recovered amount was to be subject to the CIT (Appeals) orders. The petition was disposed of without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 240 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220835</link>
      <description>The Court found the execution of recovery notices under Section 226(3) to be arbitrary and high-handed, depriving the Petitioner of any recourse. It directed the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to dispose of the stay applications promptly and ordered the Revenue to return Rs.1 crore to the Petitioner&#039;s bank account for operational purposes. The remaining recovered amount was to be subject to the CIT (Appeals) orders. The petition was disposed of without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220835</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>