<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 227 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220822</link>
    <description>A summoning order issued in a cheque complaint was set aside because the Magistrate did not show due application of mind to the cheque particulars forming the basis of the complaint. Since a summoning order is a serious step affecting personal liberty, the court held that the relevant facts must be examined before process is issued. As the impugned order contained no discussion of the cheque, it was treated as a routine order passed without proper consideration. The matter was remitted to the Magistrate for a fresh decision in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 06:16:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 227 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220822</link>
      <description>A summoning order issued in a cheque complaint was set aside because the Magistrate did not show due application of mind to the cheque particulars forming the basis of the complaint. Since a summoning order is a serious step affecting personal liberty, the court held that the relevant facts must be examined before process is issued. As the impugned order contained no discussion of the cheque, it was treated as a routine order passed without proper consideration. The matter was remitted to the Magistrate for a fresh decision in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>