<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 224 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220819</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed under Rule 15 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, as it was deemed inapplicable to the case. The judgment emphasized the importance of correctly applying legal provisions and rectifying legal errors promptly within the procedural framework to ensure fair enforcement of Central Excise laws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 12:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 224 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220819</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed under Rule 15 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, as it was deemed inapplicable to the case. The judgment emphasized the importance of correctly applying legal provisions and rectifying legal errors promptly within the procedural framework to ensure fair enforcement of Central Excise laws.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>