<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 214 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220809</link>
    <description>The appellant admitted to utilizing Cenvat credit without maintaining a sufficient balance, leading to a confirmed tax demand and imposition of interest. Despite the appellant&#039;s conduct being deemed unfair, the penalty was reduced to 25% of the tax element. The appellant was directed to pay the reduced penalty within 30 days, with a warning of full penalty payment if not done. The appeal was disposed of, with the stay application dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2013 06:57:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 214 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220809</link>
      <description>The appellant admitted to utilizing Cenvat credit without maintaining a sufficient balance, leading to a confirmed tax demand and imposition of interest. Despite the appellant&#039;s conduct being deemed unfair, the penalty was reduced to 25% of the tax element. The appellant was directed to pay the reduced penalty within 30 days, with a warning of full penalty payment if not done. The appeal was disposed of, with the stay application dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>