<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 199 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220794</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Settlement Commission&#039;s order directing payment of interest under section 28AB of the Customs Act, 1962. The court found that the Commission correctly ordered interest payment under the amended provisions, as it lacked authority to grant immunity from interest liability. The petition was dismissed without costs, but compliance time was extended by four weeks upon the Petitioner&#039;s counsel&#039;s request.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2013 06:54:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194155" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 199 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220794</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Settlement Commission&#039;s order directing payment of interest under section 28AB of the Customs Act, 1962. The court found that the Commission correctly ordered interest payment under the amended provisions, as it lacked authority to grant immunity from interest liability. The petition was dismissed without costs, but compliance time was extended by four weeks upon the Petitioner&#039;s counsel&#039;s request.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>