<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 190 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220785</link>
    <description>The court upheld the decision of the Commissioner(Appeals) in favor of the Respondent, ruling that the rent a cab service availed qualified as an input service eligible for CENVAT Credit under Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The judge found that the service was used for transportation of official and outside personnel, establishing a nexus with the manufacturing activity. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2013 06:51:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 190 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220785</link>
      <description>The court upheld the decision of the Commissioner(Appeals) in favor of the Respondent, ruling that the rent a cab service availed qualified as an input service eligible for CENVAT Credit under Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The judge found that the service was used for transportation of official and outside personnel, establishing a nexus with the manufacturing activity. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>