https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220784 Conflicting Supreme Court decisions on preventive detention required authoritative clarification on whether the detaining authority can record the necessary satisfaction when the detenue is already in custody, no bail application is pending, and bail has been granted in similar cases. Because the issue involved an apparent conflict on a recurring question of detention law, the matter was found suitable for examination by a larger Bench. The appeals were therefore directed to be placed before the Chief Justice of India for constitution of a larger Bench to resolve the conflict. en-us Tue, 15 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220784 Conflicting Supreme Court decisions on preventive detention required authoritative clarification on whether the detaining authority can record the necessary satisfaction when the detenue is already in custody, no bail application is pending, and bail has been granted in similar cases. Because the issue involved an apparent conflict on a recurring question of detention law, the matter was found suitable for examination by a larger Bench. The appeals were therefore directed to be placed before the Chief Justice of India for constitution of a larger Bench to resolve the conflict. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 15 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220784