<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 182 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220777</link>
    <description>The court upheld the communication directing the petitioner to pay tax and penalty, deeming it fair and reasonable. Despite arguments of violation of natural justice, the court found no grounds for interference in the writ jurisdiction, emphasizing the petitioner&#039;s statutory duty to fulfill the obligations. The petition was dismissed, highlighting the importance of upholding statutory duties and limiting court interference in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 06:27:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 182 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220777</link>
      <description>The court upheld the communication directing the petitioner to pay tax and penalty, deeming it fair and reasonable. Despite arguments of violation of natural justice, the court found no grounds for interference in the writ jurisdiction, emphasizing the petitioner&#039;s statutory duty to fulfill the obligations. The petition was dismissed, highlighting the importance of upholding statutory duties and limiting court interference in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220777</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>