https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220768 The court held that the notice dated September 17, 2008, under section 143(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was not barred by limitation as it fell within the extended timeframe. Additionally, despite the jurisdiction transfer from Jalandhar to Chandigarh, the petitioner's failure to timely object constituted a waiver. The court deemed actions taken at Jalandhar before the transfer valid, dismissing the writ petitions against the assessee. en-us Wed, 11 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Feb 2013 06:26:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220768 The court held that the notice dated September 17, 2008, under section 143(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was not barred by limitation as it fell within the extended timeframe. Additionally, despite the jurisdiction transfer from Jalandhar to Chandigarh, the petitioner's failure to timely object constituted a waiver. The court deemed actions taken at Jalandhar before the transfer valid, dismissing the writ petitions against the assessee. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 11 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220768