<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 170 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220765</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit attributable to sludge cleared as waste, residue or by-product was held not liable to reversal where the sludge was treated as exempt under the relevant exemption notification and not chargeable in the manner argued by Revenue. Relying on earlier Tribunal precedent affirmed by the Supreme Court, the Tribunal applied the principle of non-reversal for exempted sludge and concluded that the appellant was not required to reverse the credit. The impugned order was set aside and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 06:24:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 170 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220765</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit attributable to sludge cleared as waste, residue or by-product was held not liable to reversal where the sludge was treated as exempt under the relevant exemption notification and not chargeable in the manner argued by Revenue. Relying on earlier Tribunal precedent affirmed by the Supreme Court, the Tribunal applied the principle of non-reversal for exempted sludge and concluded that the appellant was not required to reverse the credit. The impugned order was set aside and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>