https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220763 A refund claim for money paid to secure exhibition space was held to fall outside Article 24 of the Limitation Act because the payment was only a deposit made during negotiations, with no concluded contract and no immediate right to recover it as money received for the plaintiff's use. Article 24 applies only where the amount is recoverable on receipt in that character; where refund depends on later events, it does not apply. The residuary Article 113 therefore governed the suit, and the claim was within limitation. en-us Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Feb 2013 06:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220763 A refund claim for money paid to secure exhibition space was held to fall outside Article 24 of the Limitation Act because the payment was only a deposit made during negotiations, with no concluded contract and no immediate right to recover it as money received for the plaintiff's use. Article 24 applies only where the amount is recoverable on receipt in that character; where refund depends on later events, it does not apply. The residuary Article 113 therefore governed the suit, and the claim was within limitation. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220763