<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 163 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220758</link>
    <description>The revision application was successful as the government concluded that the rebate of duty on the exported goods was admissible under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The impugned orders were set aside, and the original adjudicating authority was directed to sanction the rebate, if otherwise in order. Consequently, the rebate claim filed by M/s. Ashok Leyland Ltd. for duty paid on chassis cleared for export was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 06:20:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 163 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220758</link>
      <description>The revision application was successful as the government concluded that the rebate of duty on the exported goods was admissible under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The impugned orders were set aside, and the original adjudicating authority was directed to sanction the rebate, if otherwise in order. Consequently, the rebate claim filed by M/s. Ashok Leyland Ltd. for duty paid on chassis cleared for export was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>