<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 160 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220755</link>
    <description>The court upheld the legality of the search and seizure operations conducted by the Coimbatore Commissionerate, dismissing the writ petitions. It found jurisdiction existed for the search warrants due to business activities conducted by the petitioners in Coimbatore. The court deemed the searches valid, emphasizing the need for investigating alleged tax evasion. The petitioners were directed to receive copies of seized documents, with the court affirming the voluntary nature of a Rs. 2 crore payment made during the search.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 10:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 160 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220755</link>
      <description>The court upheld the legality of the search and seizure operations conducted by the Coimbatore Commissionerate, dismissing the writ petitions. It found jurisdiction existed for the search warrants due to business activities conducted by the petitioners in Coimbatore. The court deemed the searches valid, emphasizing the need for investigating alleged tax evasion. The petitioners were directed to receive copies of seized documents, with the court affirming the voluntary nature of a Rs. 2 crore payment made during the search.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>