<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 157 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220752</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the department to treat the respondent-company&#039;s registration as provisional in the category of business auxiliary. The Tribunal was instructed to independently assess the nature of the respondent&#039;s business activities within three months. The provisional registration would remain effective until the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing the importance of an unbiased evaluation and adherence to statutory obligations during the proceedings. The judgment underscored the need for a fair consideration of the registration application and the Tribunal&#039;s autonomy in decision-making without being influenced by prior determinations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2014 14:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194113" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 157 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220752</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the department to treat the respondent-company&#039;s registration as provisional in the category of business auxiliary. The Tribunal was instructed to independently assess the nature of the respondent&#039;s business activities within three months. The provisional registration would remain effective until the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing the importance of an unbiased evaluation and adherence to statutory obligations during the proceedings. The judgment underscored the need for a fair consideration of the registration application and the Tribunal&#039;s autonomy in decision-making without being influenced by prior determinations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>