<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 149 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220744</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petition, quashing the impugned order by the Commissioner of Income Tax and directing the respondent to refund the amount of Rs.5,92,96,881/- with statutory interest to the petitioner. The decision emphasized the legal effect of amalgamation schemes on financial transactions and clarified the scope of revision petitions under section 264 of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 15:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194105" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 149 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220744</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petition, quashing the impugned order by the Commissioner of Income Tax and directing the respondent to refund the amount of Rs.5,92,96,881/- with statutory interest to the petitioner. The decision emphasized the legal effect of amalgamation schemes on financial transactions and clarified the scope of revision petitions under section 264 of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>