<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 136 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220726</link>
    <description>The Government upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order, rejecting rebate claims due to insufficient documentation, improper duty payment certification, and the risk of double benefit from Cenvat credit. The revision application was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 06:37:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194088" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 136 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220726</link>
      <description>The Government upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order, rejecting rebate claims due to insufficient documentation, improper duty payment certification, and the risk of double benefit from Cenvat credit. The revision application was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>