<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 131 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220721</link>
    <description>Article 243-G is an enabling provision that permits devolution of functions to panchayats by law, but it does not itself require the public distribution system to be vested in any particular tier of local government. The State therefore retained discretion under the applicable statutory scheme to choose the implementing authority, and no enforceable right arose in favour of the panchayats for such assignment. Separately, the writ challenge was found not maintainable because the Zila Parishad lacked demonstrated locus standi and the petition was barred by delay and laches. The High Court judgment was set aside and the State&#039;s appeal succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2025 17:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 131 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220721</link>
      <description>Article 243-G is an enabling provision that permits devolution of functions to panchayats by law, but it does not itself require the public distribution system to be vested in any particular tier of local government. The State therefore retained discretion under the applicable statutory scheme to choose the implementing authority, and no enforceable right arose in favour of the panchayats for such assignment. Separately, the writ challenge was found not maintainable because the Zila Parishad lacked demonstrated locus standi and the petition was barred by delay and laches. The High Court judgment was set aside and the State&#039;s appeal succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>