https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220719 The Court upheld the Tribunal's direction for compliance with the order dated 24.11.2008, stating that the workman was entitled to benefits similar to those of Group 'D' staff who transitioned to Group 'C' without involvement of the Staff Selection Commission. The petitioner's challenge through a writ petition was dismissed, with the Court emphasizing that the workman should receive benefits as per the order. The Court found no error in the Tribunal's directive and dismissed the writ petition, directing implementation of the 24.11.2008 order. en-us Tue, 29 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Feb 2013 09:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220719 The Court upheld the Tribunal's direction for compliance with the order dated 24.11.2008, stating that the workman was entitled to benefits similar to those of Group 'D' staff who transitioned to Group 'C' without involvement of the Staff Selection Commission. The petitioner's challenge through a writ petition was dismissed, with the Court emphasizing that the workman should receive benefits as per the order. The Court found no error in the Tribunal's directive and dismissed the writ petition, directing implementation of the 24.11.2008 order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 29 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220719