<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 120 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220710</link>
    <description>The court declared the search and seizure operation illegal, quashing the seizure of gold ornaments. It emphasized the lack of sufficient reason for the authority to believe the jewelry would not be disclosed for tax purposes. The court ordered the release of the seized jewelry and denied the Department&#039;s request for a stay of the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2015 17:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 120 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220710</link>
      <description>The court declared the search and seizure operation illegal, quashing the seizure of gold ornaments. It emphasized the lack of sufficient reason for the authority to believe the jewelry would not be disclosed for tax purposes. The court ordered the release of the seized jewelry and denied the Department&#039;s request for a stay of the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>