<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 117 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220707</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Kolkata remanded the matter to the original authority for a fresh decision. The Tribunal found that the importer and its Director were deprived of the opportunity to effectively defend their case due to the reliance on only the Plant Quarantine Certificate in the Show Cause Notice. The Department&#039;s concerns regarding the legality and propriety of the impugned order were also noted. The lower adjudicating authority was instructed to reconsider all issues and grounds of appeal from both parties, allowing for a fair opportunity for a hearing and presenting supporting documents. Ultimately, the appeals were disposed of through remand for a comprehensive reevaluation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 08:07:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 117 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220707</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Kolkata remanded the matter to the original authority for a fresh decision. The Tribunal found that the importer and its Director were deprived of the opportunity to effectively defend their case due to the reliance on only the Plant Quarantine Certificate in the Show Cause Notice. The Department&#039;s concerns regarding the legality and propriety of the impugned order were also noted. The lower adjudicating authority was instructed to reconsider all issues and grounds of appeal from both parties, allowing for a fair opportunity for a hearing and presenting supporting documents. Ultimately, the appeals were disposed of through remand for a comprehensive reevaluation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>