https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220700 A civil suit for damages was held maintainable despite the statutory bar in Sections 92 and 93 of the Tripura Excise Act, because the scheme did not provide an effective alternative remedy and the alleged loss was not protected as an act done in good faith in relation to excise revenue. The dispute concerned loss to unsold IMFL and beer stock after the bonded warehouse licence expired, and the authorities failed to arrange lawful disposal despite repeated requests. Compensation was awarded for proved stock loss, godown rent and incidental shifting cost, with simple interest from the date of notice; the claim for 15% interest was rejected. en-us Mon, 17 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Feb 2013 09:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220700 A civil suit for damages was held maintainable despite the statutory bar in Sections 92 and 93 of the Tripura Excise Act, because the scheme did not provide an effective alternative remedy and the alleged loss was not protected as an act done in good faith in relation to excise revenue. The dispute concerned loss to unsold IMFL and beer stock after the bonded warehouse licence expired, and the authorities failed to arrange lawful disposal despite repeated requests. Compensation was awarded for proved stock loss, godown rent and incidental shifting cost, with simple interest from the date of notice; the claim for 15% interest was rejected. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 17 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220700