<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 104 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220694</link>
    <description>Refund under Notification No. 41/2007-S.T. was interpreted, in light of CBEC Circular No. 134/3/2011-ST, to cover education cess and secondary and higher secondary education cess collected along with service tax. The clarification was treated as extending the refund scope to the cess components, making their exclusion unsustainable. The note records that the refund claim was therefore accepted to that extent and the department&#039;s appeals failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 07:03:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 104 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220694</link>
      <description>Refund under Notification No. 41/2007-S.T. was interpreted, in light of CBEC Circular No. 134/3/2011-ST, to cover education cess and secondary and higher secondary education cess collected along with service tax. The clarification was treated as extending the refund scope to the cess components, making their exclusion unsustainable. The note records that the refund claim was therefore accepted to that extent and the department&#039;s appeals failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>