<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 100 - JAMMU &amp; KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220690</link>
    <description>A commercial supply contract dispute turned on whether time for delivery had been extended and whether writ relief was available despite an arbitration clause. No implied extension was inferred from later correspondence or duty exemption certificates because the contract required an express extension at the buyer&#039;s discretion; the delivery period therefore remained unextended and cancellation could not be disturbed on that basis. The dispute was also held to fall within a valid arbitration agreement, and no exceptional ground justified writ intervention in a commercial contract matter. The parties were therefore directed to pursue arbitration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 16:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 100 - JAMMU &amp; KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220690</link>
      <description>A commercial supply contract dispute turned on whether time for delivery had been extended and whether writ relief was available despite an arbitration clause. No implied extension was inferred from later correspondence or duty exemption certificates because the contract required an express extension at the buyer&#039;s discretion; the delivery period therefore remained unextended and cancellation could not be disturbed on that basis. The dispute was also held to fall within a valid arbitration agreement, and no exceptional ground justified writ intervention in a commercial contract matter. The parties were therefore directed to pursue arbitration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>