<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 96 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220686</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to treat both Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) and Short Term Capital Gains (STCG) on the sale of shares as capital gains for the assessment year 2008-09. This decision overturned the CIT(A)&#039;s findings and allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, based on consistent treatment in prior years and the absence of new facts to warrant a different classification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 07:02:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 96 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220686</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to treat both Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) and Short Term Capital Gains (STCG) on the sale of shares as capital gains for the assessment year 2008-09. This decision overturned the CIT(A)&#039;s findings and allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, based on consistent treatment in prior years and the absence of new facts to warrant a different classification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220686</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>