<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 93 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220683</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was not valid. Merely invoking section 50C(2) for computing capital gains did not justify the penalty, as there was no evidence of the assessee furnishing false particulars. The appeals were allowed in favor of the assessee as the penalty was wrongly confirmed by the CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2016 13:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194045" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 93 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220683</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was not valid. Merely invoking section 50C(2) for computing capital gains did not justify the penalty, as there was no evidence of the assessee furnishing false particulars. The appeals were allowed in favor of the assessee as the penalty was wrongly confirmed by the CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>