<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 83 - CESTAT New Delhi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220673</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to set aside the confiscation order and remand the case to the Competent Authority for joint adjudication with the pending duty demand case. The Tribunal found the confiscation premature as the question of crossing the SSI exemption limit was pending adjudication separately, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive resolution. The appellants&#039; challenge was dismissed, affirming the importance of addressing all interconnected issues together for a just outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2014 16:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194035" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 83 - CESTAT New Delhi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220673</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to set aside the confiscation order and remand the case to the Competent Authority for joint adjudication with the pending duty demand case. The Tribunal found the confiscation premature as the question of crossing the SSI exemption limit was pending adjudication separately, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive resolution. The appellants&#039; challenge was dismissed, affirming the importance of addressing all interconnected issues together for a just outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220673</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>