<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 80 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220670</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, holding that the appellant is entitled to the input credit claimed. The Court emphasized that the VAT Act does not impose an obligation on the purchasing dealer to ensure the selling dealer&#039;s tax compliance. The VAT authorities were directed to verify and grant the input credit within two months. The imposition of penalties on the purchasing dealer was deemed unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2014 13:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 80 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220670</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, holding that the appellant is entitled to the input credit claimed. The Court emphasized that the VAT Act does not impose an obligation on the purchasing dealer to ensure the selling dealer&#039;s tax compliance. The VAT authorities were directed to verify and grant the input credit within two months. The imposition of penalties on the purchasing dealer was deemed unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>