<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 62 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220652</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, highlighting the petitioner&#039;s lack of cooperation in following specified procedures for document inspection and retrieval. The petitioner&#039;s failure to visit the counsel&#039;s office on the specified date and time resulted in records not being available, leading to the appeal&#039;s dismissal due to unnecessary litigation and delays in complying with court orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 07:38:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194014" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 62 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220652</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, highlighting the petitioner&#039;s lack of cooperation in following specified procedures for document inspection and retrieval. The petitioner&#039;s failure to visit the counsel&#039;s office on the specified date and time resulted in records not being available, leading to the appeal&#039;s dismissal due to unnecessary litigation and delays in complying with court orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>