<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 51 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220640</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appellant&#039;s appeal due to failure to deposit service tax, holding that the gross amount charged for security services, including payments to personnel, was subject to taxation without deduction. The Court emphasized that service tax is not a value addition but a requirement for providing services. The appellant was given a grace period to pay the tax without penalty, considering confusion over minimum wage obligations. The appeal was disposed of based on the Court&#039;s interpretation of the taxing statute, affirming the appellant&#039;s liability to pay tax on the total gross amount charged for security services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 13:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 51 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220640</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appellant&#039;s appeal due to failure to deposit service tax, holding that the gross amount charged for security services, including payments to personnel, was subject to taxation without deduction. The Court emphasized that service tax is not a value addition but a requirement for providing services. The appellant was given a grace period to pay the tax without penalty, considering confusion over minimum wage obligations. The appeal was disposed of based on the Court&#039;s interpretation of the taxing statute, affirming the appellant&#039;s liability to pay tax on the total gross amount charged for security services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>