<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 39 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220627</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, finding that the denial of cross-examination did not breach the principles of natural justice at that stage. It emphasized that the adjudicating authority had provided adequate opportunities for the petitioners to present their case and that the discretion to allow cross-examination rested with the authority. The court highlighted that any potential prejudice from the denial could be addressed through the appeals process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 17:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193989" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 39 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220627</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, finding that the denial of cross-examination did not breach the principles of natural justice at that stage. It emphasized that the adjudicating authority had provided adequate opportunities for the petitioners to present their case and that the discretion to allow cross-examination rested with the authority. The court highlighted that any potential prejudice from the denial could be addressed through the appeals process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220627</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>