https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220624 The Court dismissed the Petitions, holding that the cheques issued by the Petitioners were towards their liability and not merely as security. The Court found no merit in the Petitioners' arguments regarding misrepresentation and the nature of the cheques. The observations made were necessary for the disposal of the Petitions and would not influence the merits of the case pending before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate. en-us Wed, 30 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Feb 2013 16:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220624 The Court dismissed the Petitions, holding that the cheques issued by the Petitioners were towards their liability and not merely as security. The Court found no merit in the Petitioners' arguments regarding misrepresentation and the nature of the cheques. The observations made were necessary for the disposal of the Petitions and would not influence the merits of the case pending before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 30 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220624