https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220615 Prolonged pendency of a second appeal, repeated adjournments and non-appearance of counsel were treated as serious impediments to the administration of justice. The Court stressed that expeditious disposal is integral to adjudication and that adjournments should not be granted mechanically where a matter is stagnating. It noted that the restoration and repeated adjournment of the appeal reflected inordinate delay, but no interference was warranted because the constitutional court concerned was expected to deal with the matter in the manner it considered appropriate. The petition was disposed of without disturbing the impugned order. en-us Tue, 29 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Aug 2017 11:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220615 Prolonged pendency of a second appeal, repeated adjournments and non-appearance of counsel were treated as serious impediments to the administration of justice. The Court stressed that expeditious disposal is integral to adjudication and that adjournments should not be granted mechanically where a matter is stagnating. It noted that the restoration and repeated adjournment of the appeal reflected inordinate delay, but no interference was warranted because the constitutional court concerned was expected to deal with the matter in the manner it considered appropriate. The petition was disposed of without disturbing the impugned order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 29 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220615