https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220614 A writ petition challenging a VAT assessment order was held not maintainable because the Madhya Pradesh VAT Act, 2002 provided an efficacious alternative remedy by way of appeal under section 46. The Court stated that the statutory deposit requirement under section 46(5) did not, by itself, justify bypassing the appellate process and invoking writ jurisdiction. The petition was therefore not entertained, and the petitioner was left to pursue the statutory appeal, including any request for waiver of deposit before the appellate authority in accordance with law. en-us Mon, 16 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Feb 2013 08:07:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220614 A writ petition challenging a VAT assessment order was held not maintainable because the Madhya Pradesh VAT Act, 2002 provided an efficacious alternative remedy by way of appeal under section 46. The Court stated that the statutory deposit requirement under section 46(5) did not, by itself, justify bypassing the appellate process and invoking writ jurisdiction. The petition was therefore not entertained, and the petitioner was left to pursue the statutory appeal, including any request for waiver of deposit before the appellate authority in accordance with law. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 16 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220614