<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 25 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220613</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the appellants to make pre-deposits for service tax liabilities related to &#039;Rent-a-Cab service&#039; for the period 2006-07 to 2009-10. The Tribunal required pre-deposits to comply with Central Excise Act and Finance Act provisions, despite arguments based on SEZ Act provisions. Compliance with pre-deposit requirements was mandated to avoid recovery actions during the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 08:06:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 25 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220613</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the appellants to make pre-deposits for service tax liabilities related to &#039;Rent-a-Cab service&#039; for the period 2006-07 to 2009-10. The Tribunal required pre-deposits to comply with Central Excise Act and Finance Act provisions, despite arguments based on SEZ Act provisions. Compliance with pre-deposit requirements was mandated to avoid recovery actions during the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>