<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 24 - CESTAT Ahmedabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220612</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the first appellate authority&#039;s decision, ruling that the respondent was not liable to discharge the service tax on the commission received from the insurance company. The Tribunal found that the service tax liability rested with the insurance company, not the respondent, as per the relevant provisions of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. The decision emphasized the need for accurate interpretation of rules concerning service tax liability in cases involving commissions paid by entities like insurance companies to their licensed agents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 08:06:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 24 - CESTAT Ahmedabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220612</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the first appellate authority&#039;s decision, ruling that the respondent was not liable to discharge the service tax on the commission received from the insurance company. The Tribunal found that the service tax liability rested with the insurance company, not the respondent, as per the relevant provisions of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. The decision emphasized the need for accurate interpretation of rules concerning service tax liability in cases involving commissions paid by entities like insurance companies to their licensed agents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>