https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220610 A registered sale deed could not be treated as a conditional sale with a binding right of reconveyance where the added words in the margin and the reconveyance clause were inserted after execution and were not attested by the executant. Non-compliance with the Registration Act and the Karnataka Registration Rules governing interlineations and alterations rendered the later insertions unreliable, and the evidence showed the additions were suspicious and inconsistent with a genuine conditional sale. The Court also noted that interference with findings of fact in second appeal is limited to perversity, and the High Court properly restored the trial court's view. The alleged reconveyance right was not proved and specific performance was rejected. en-us Fri, 08 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Oct 2015 15:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220610 A registered sale deed could not be treated as a conditional sale with a binding right of reconveyance where the added words in the margin and the reconveyance clause were inserted after execution and were not attested by the executant. Non-compliance with the Registration Act and the Karnataka Registration Rules governing interlineations and alterations rendered the later insertions unreliable, and the evidence showed the additions were suspicious and inconsistent with a genuine conditional sale. The Court also noted that interference with findings of fact in second appeal is limited to perversity, and the High Court properly restored the trial court's view. The alleged reconveyance right was not proved and specific performance was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 08 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220610