<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 21 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220608</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal as no substantial questions of law arose from the Revenue&#039;s issues. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s findings that the document recovered did not prove unexplained investments or money transactions, and the destruction of evidence did not indicate wrongdoing by the assessee. The disallowance based on unexplained investment and destruction of evidence was upheld, leading to the appeal&#039;s dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 08:05:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193971" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 21 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220608</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal as no substantial questions of law arose from the Revenue&#039;s issues. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s findings that the document recovered did not prove unexplained investments or money transactions, and the destruction of evidence did not indicate wrongdoing by the assessee. The disallowance based on unexplained investment and destruction of evidence was upheld, leading to the appeal&#039;s dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>