<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 7 - CESTAT Ahmedabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220594</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit is available on HR coils, MS plates, channels and similar Chapter 72 goods when they are used to fabricate storage tanks deployed in the factory for manufacturing final products. The text explains that storage tanks qualify as capital goods, and goods used in their manufacture are treated as inputs under Explanation 2 to the Cenvat Credit Rules. The exclusion for goods used in constructing factory sheds, foundations or support structures does not apply where the tanks are not shown to be embedded to the earth or otherwise used for such excluded purposes. On that basis, the Tribunal&#039;s consistent view was that the credit is admissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 17:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 7 - CESTAT Ahmedabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220594</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit is available on HR coils, MS plates, channels and similar Chapter 72 goods when they are used to fabricate storage tanks deployed in the factory for manufacturing final products. The text explains that storage tanks qualify as capital goods, and goods used in their manufacture are treated as inputs under Explanation 2 to the Cenvat Credit Rules. The exclusion for goods used in constructing factory sheds, foundations or support structures does not apply where the tanks are not shown to be embedded to the earth or otherwise used for such excluded purposes. On that basis, the Tribunal&#039;s consistent view was that the credit is admissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>