<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 6 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220593</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalties imposed under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The decision was based on the appellant&#039;s lack of awareness of the law and financial difficulties, considering these factors as justifications for the non-payment of service tax. The Tribunal invoked Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s mitigating circumstances and ignorance in the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 14:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 6 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220593</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalties imposed under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The decision was based on the appellant&#039;s lack of awareness of the law and financial difficulties, considering these factors as justifications for the non-payment of service tax. The Tribunal invoked Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s mitigating circumstances and ignorance in the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>