<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 685 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220582</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against an order setting aside duty demand confirmation after the death of a sole proprietor. The legal heirs&#039; undertaking to pay pending excise duty did not cover demands raised post-undertaking. As the show cause notice was issued against a non-existent firm, the demand was deemed unsustainable. The Tribunal upheld the order, stating that the legal entity ceased to exist upon the proprietor&#039;s death, making the demand against the non-existent entity invalid. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 18:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 685 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220582</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against an order setting aside duty demand confirmation after the death of a sole proprietor. The legal heirs&#039; undertaking to pay pending excise duty did not cover demands raised post-undertaking. As the show cause notice was issued against a non-existent firm, the demand was deemed unsustainable. The Tribunal upheld the order, stating that the legal entity ceased to exist upon the proprietor&#039;s death, making the demand against the non-existent entity invalid. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>