<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 684 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220581</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the refund claim for the entire service tax amount paid by the appellants, amounting to Rs.5,64,818/-. The Tribunal found the refund claim timely filed within one year of the liability settlement and accepted the explanation that service tax was not included in the installment amounts, thus ruling that the bar of unjust enrichment did not apply in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 14:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 684 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220581</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the refund claim for the entire service tax amount paid by the appellants, amounting to Rs.5,64,818/-. The Tribunal found the refund claim timely filed within one year of the liability settlement and accepted the explanation that service tax was not included in the installment amounts, thus ruling that the bar of unjust enrichment did not apply in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>