<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 664 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220561</link>
    <description>Where excise duty is paid before service of the show cause notice, Section 11A(2B) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 generally excludes penalty and interest. That protection does not extend to cases of intentional non-payment or deception, but the Revenue failed to establish any such fraudulent element here. On the stated facts, the assessee&#039;s pre-notice payment displaced the normal penal consequence, and penalty and interest were held not leviable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 01:12:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193924" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 664 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220561</link>
      <description>Where excise duty is paid before service of the show cause notice, Section 11A(2B) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 generally excludes penalty and interest. That protection does not extend to cases of intentional non-payment or deception, but the Revenue failed to establish any such fraudulent element here. On the stated facts, the assessee&#039;s pre-notice payment displaced the normal penal consequence, and penalty and interest were held not leviable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>